Thursday, June 12, 2008
LV boutique in E. China closed for disqualification
Louis Vuitton, the luxury retailer, closed its boutique in Hangzhou, the capital of east China's Zhejiang Province, after the local industry and commerce authority seized most of its products, the local newspaper Today Morning Express reports.
The boutique, located in the high-end Hangzhou Tower department store, was found with its display window cleaned out, curtains drawn and door logos carefully covered with white paper.
"Last Friday morning, officers with the local industry and commerce authority entered the shop for an apparent spot check. Then salespeople began politely asking customers to leave and reported the incident to the head office. Later, the officers seized nearly all of the bags in the shop, which had been closed during the seizure, according to an anonymous newspaper source.
An official with the provincial Administration of Industry and Commerce says the administration found that "some of the boutique's products did not measure up to standards" during a spot quality check in May.
According to regulations, Louis Vuitton can dispute charges within 15 days of the issuance of the official document and request a re-inspection. However, the company did not take action before the June 6th deadline on which day the administration seized the disqualified products.
He didn't reveal any further information, saying the details would be released after the case was concluded.
The provincial Administration of Industry and Commerce did not order the closure of the boutique, which made the decision itself, the official stressed.
Zhao Xiaojing, the director of communications for Louis Vuitton China, says the problem was caused by lack of one small piece of sample leather, which is usually attached to the product as a material mark in China.
"All our leather accessories are produced in France and the mark is not required by regulations there," Zhao said.
An internal source explained the boutique had to close because luxury products are generally made one-year in advance and then allocated to shops around the world, based on a reasonable need. Thus it is not possible to transfer stock from other cities or to get supplies from the source in a short time.
For actual article click here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Disclaimer: I created this blog for the sole purpose of sharing my passion and obsession for the brand that is Louis Vuitton. I am in no way, shape, or form connected with this company nor its subsidiaries. This is my personal blog and the views and opinions expressed herein represent my own and not those of the people, institutions, or organizations that I may or may not be related to, unless stated explicitly. Also, my thoughts and opinions change from time to time as I learn and develop my understanding regarding the things and issues that I am blogging about. This blog provides a snapshot of the knowledge, views, and opinions that I hold at that particular moment in time and these might change. I reserve the right to evolve my knowledge, thoughts, and viewpoints over time and to change them without assigning any reason. My blog includes links to other sites or blogs operated by third parties. These are provided as a means of convenient access to you for the information or opinion contained therein. I am in no way responsible for the content of any other sites or any products or services that may be offered through other sites. I try my very best to credit photos, articles, or videos that are contained herein. I hope you enjoy reading my blog as much as I enjoy writing it. Drop me a line 4dluvoflv@gmail.com. Thanks and here's wishing you LVoe!!!
So, let me get this straight . . . China decided to ransack an entire LV store for missing a "sample leather?????"
ReplyDeleteIt looks like it...
ReplyDelete